787 fuel burn per hour site:www.airliners.net - Axtarish в Google
15 сент. 2018 г. · So, based on your information a ULH sector like LAX-MEL the 789 burns 5600kg/h. The range across different carriers appears to be 5400-5600kg/h ...
11 сент. 2018 г. · The 787-9 burns approximately 1.5% to 2% less fuel than the A350-900 with the same payload weight. This is because the 787-9 is a lighter frame ...
7 мая 2023 г. · On a typical 11 hour sector the 787-10 would burn approximately 5800 kg per hour or 63,800 kg. So around 3-4% better depending on many variables ...
19 апр. 2017 г. · For the A350-100, this is approximately 6400 kg / h for 787-10 about 5700 kg / h in normal operation for long haul. Compare these figures for ...
19 июл. 2017 г. · The 787-8 burns roughly 4.6t per hour, the 787-9 roughly 5t so broadly speaking if you take the block-hours of the trip and multiply by those numbers you will ...
11 апр. 2016 г. · Just look in the flight manual. For GEnx its listed as 53Lbs/Min combined fuel flow. Anyhow if aircraft are sitting for a while, with concurrence of ATC they ...
3 июн. 2008 г. · We seem to burn on average about 11,100 kg/hr on the 744 (varies between 13,000 kg/hr to 9,000 kg/hr on a flight) and 8,100 kg/hr on the 77W ( ...
2 сент. 2014 г. · Cutting fuel burn by about $600 per hour or $9k per day. So the same engine as the 787, and yet it has a 10-15% higher fuel burn. Airbus ...
17 мая 2019 г. · Gross weight is gross weight. When it comes to fuel burn per hour, the aircraft doesn't much care if the weight is OEW, cargo, pax, or fuel.
28 дек. 2023 г. · The consensus is the A339 is close to the 789 on missions of 4000 nm or less. Roughly 1-2%. Beyond this the 789 has a distinct advantage. Up to 5-6% depending ...
Novbeti >

 -  - 
Axtarisha Qayit
Anarim.Az


Anarim.Az

Sayt Rehberliyi ile Elaqe

Saytdan Istifade Qaydalari

Anarim.Az 2004-2023