15 сент. 2018 г. · So, based on your information a ULH sector like LAX-MEL the 789 burns 5600kg/h. The range across different carriers appears to be 5400-5600kg/h ... |
7 мая 2023 г. · On a typical 11 hour sector the 787-10 would burn approximately 5800 kg per hour or 63,800 kg. So around 3-4% better depending on many variables ... |
13 сент. 2018 г. · The 787-9 burns approximately 1.5% to 2% less fuel than the A350-900 with the same payload weight. This is because the 787-9 is a lighter frame ... |
19 апр. 2017 г. · For the A350-100, this is approximately 6400 kg / h for 787-10 about 5700 kg / h in normal operation for long haul. Compare these figures for ... |
19 июл. 2017 г. · The 787-8 burns roughly 4.6t per hour, the 787-9 roughly 5t so broadly speaking if you take the block-hours of the trip and multiply by those numbers you will ... |
11 апр. 2016 г. · Just look in the flight manual. For GEnx its listed as 53Lbs/Min combined fuel flow. Anyhow if aircraft are sitting for a while, with concurrence of ATC they ... |
3 июн. 2008 г. · We seem to burn on average about 11,100 kg/hr on the 744 (varies between 13,000 kg/hr to 9,000 kg/hr on a flight) and 8,100 kg/hr on the 77W ( ... |
2 сент. 2014 г. · Cutting fuel burn by about $600 per hour or $9k per day. So the same engine as the 787, and yet it has a 10-15% higher fuel burn. Airbus ... |
17 мая 2019 г. · Gross weight is gross weight. When it comes to fuel burn per hour, the aircraft doesn't much care if the weight is OEW, cargo, pax, or fuel. |
28 дек. 2023 г. · The consensus is the A339 is close to the 789 on missions of 4000 nm or less. Roughly 1-2%. Beyond this the 789 has a distinct advantage. Up to 5-6% depending ... |
Novbeti > |
Axtarisha Qayit Anarim.Az Anarim.Az Sayt Rehberliyi ile Elaqe Saytdan Istifade Qaydalari Anarim.Az 2004-2023 |