The interests of the state and federal government in regulating abortions conflict with the woman's ability to exercise her right of choice.

Federalism is used as a guise for withdrawing fundamental rights to abortion by the US Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.

Both sides want a national law permitting or prohibit- ing abortion. There is no clear constitutional basis for either one, although this would not stop ...

Thus, for the Federal Government to force states to re-open their economies in the midst of a pandemic or to allow abortion within their borders without ...

The Dobbs decision, which gives states complete control over abortion laws, has unleashed conflicts that resemble the battles that arose when enslaved people ...

States might attempt to regulate abortions beyond their borders, or Congress might enact a national abortion regulation.

Federal and State Bans and Restrictions on Abortion. At the federal level, the Hyde Amendment and a federal abortion ban both limit abortion access nationwide.

In 2021 South Australia (SA) became the last Australian jurisdiction to modernize its abortion laws by way of the Termination of Pregnancy Act 2021 (SA).

The history of those struggles reminds us of the corrosive impact of interstate conflict and of the importance of federal protections for freedom and individual.

27 апр. 2023 г. · The Dobbs decision fundamentally changed the federal landscape regarding reproductive rights, allowing states to regulate almost all aspects of ...