The appellant (B) was convicted of wounding with intent. He claimed the defence of automatism caused by hypoglaecemia as a result of failing to take food after ...

A distinction was drawn between consuming dangerous drug and alcohol and failure to ingest food after insulin injection.

R v Bailey is a 1983 decision of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales considering criminal responsibility as to non-insane automatism.

R v Bailey [1983] Crim LR 353 Court of Appeal The appellant went to the house of his ex-lover's new partner, Mr Harrison. The appellant was visibly upset ...

This case highlights the complexities surrounding the defense of automatism in cases involving medical conditions such as diabetes.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon his plea of nolo contendere to auto theft (Veh. Code, § 10851) and endangering the life or health of a child (Pen ...

The current study will investigate Chinese university students' foreign language anxiety in online English classes.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon his plea of nolo contendere to auto theft (Veh.Code, § 10851) and endangering the life or health of a child (Pen.

10 июл. 2023 г. · In the case of R v Bailey [1983] 1 W.L.R. 760, it was held that self-induced automatism can apply as a defence where the defendant in the case ...

R v BAILEY (1983). PUBLISHED March 11, 1983. SHARE. Recorder had not given any directions to the jury on the elements of recklessness. CA (Crim Div) (Griffiths ...