29 мар. 2016 г. · set -x enables a shell mode where all executed commands are printed to the terminal. In your case it's used for debugging. |
28 сент. 2020 г. · Is there any practical difference in debugging using bash -x scriptname.sh or using set -x inside the script and then calling it? |
2 нояб. 2012 г. · I had the same problem, and I was able to find a solution that doesn't use a subshell: set -x command { set +x; } 2>/dev/null. |
19 окт. 2017 г. · I'm using set -x to implement a debug flag in a shell script A.sh : if I call A.sh -d the -d flag will result in set -x being called. |
22 июн. 2018 г. · When I use "set -x" in the script it at least prints some information on what it just executed, but I don't really like the output it generates. |
5 окт. 2018 г. · So I have a file deploy.sh, and it has the shell script. Since I know about it, I have a little confusion, that is what does that set -x ... |
21 нояб. 2022 г. · Is there a way to limit the scope of set -x only to the duration of a specific function or otherwise guarantee that set +x always gets called? |
12 мар. 2013 г. · I am writing a Bash script where I want all commands to be echoed as they occur. I know that I need to use set -x and set +x to toggle this behaviour off and ... |
25 сент. 2013 г. · If you don't want to bash -x the whole file, then as long as you don't mind running in a subshell, you can simply do this per line: (set -x; ... |
28 янв. 2013 г. · I would like to set -x temporarily in my script and then return in to the original state. Is there a way to do it without starting new subshell? |
Novbeti > |
Axtarisha Qayit Anarim.Az Anarim.Az Sayt Rehberliyi ile Elaqe Saytdan Istifade Qaydalari Anarim.Az 2004-2023 |