1 окт. 2023 г. · BTRFS is much more modern than NTFS and is objectively better. You get subvolumes, snapshots, better data integrity, etc. |
5 мар. 2023 г. · The best solution I've found so far (still testing it) is btrfs which can can be perfectly (almost natively) accessed from windows using the WinBTRFS driver. |
4 нояб. 2023 г. · For Linux you can't go wrong with either ext4 or btrfs. I personally love btrfs for its easy RAID set up and management capabilities. |
5 мар. 2023 г. · I don't think Linux can use NTFS as main partition. I don't trust BTRFS. File system must be stable because it contains important data. Use EXT4. |
16 янв. 2024 г. · But it only works if you don't have more than one partition. Ntfs2btrfs can only convert ntfs partitions to btrfs partitions. It is not broken ... |
5 мар. 2023 г. · I'll choose NTFS (for Storage ) only if I've left no option to make it possible if with btrfs. |
16 окт. 2022 г. · XFS for array, BTRFS for cache as it's the only option if you have multiple drives in the pool. If only a single drive in a cache pool i tend to ... |
16 сент. 2024 г. · I run NTFS for shared space simply for game pass, and haven't had any issues. |
11 сент. 2024 г. · And also, is it worth it? Testing with the 'fio' tool, NTFS shows up to 4x faster than Fedora's default Btrfs. |
11 янв. 2022 г. · btrfs has some great things going for it and it's always getting better, but it's not quite as reliable as other filesystems yet imo. I'm also a ... |
Novbeti > |
Axtarisha Qayit Anarim.Az Anarim.Az Sayt Rehberliyi ile Elaqe Saytdan Istifade Qaydalari Anarim.Az 2004-2023 |