15 окт. 2023 г. · Of the other two, I tend to prefer ext4, as XFS tends to perform better with large sets of data, but it's a smaller difference than with Btrfs.

7 июн. 2024 г. · xfs is probably more stable and robus. all rounder. and I get the impression that f2fs is very good for small files and mediocre for large ones.

12 дек. 2020 г. · XFS on the other hand is older, so more "mature." And it can be much faster than btrfs, especially with lots of smaller files. It is a very good ...

1 янв. 2022 г. · Use either EXT4 or BTRFS. They both have their own benefits, but BTRFS has more features so I would say go with it.

28 мар. 2024 г. · ZFS is preferred > 4GB ram for any system, and UFS otherwise on FreeBSD or XFS on Linux. AES-NI works wonders for most compression workloads ...

9 авг. 2024 г. · Bcachefs beating Btrfs in 9/11 tests! Nice! (and losing to XFS and ext4 in 11/11 tests, but that's not surprising given that it's COW and ...

16 окт. 2022 г. · XFS for array, BTRFS for cache as it's the only option if you have multiple drives in the pool. If only a single drive in a cache pool i tend to ...

8 авг. 2023 г. · Again, zfs IS superior as a file system. Unraid is just good old xfs (or btrfs, but that also has/had it's issues, and now you can do zfs, even ...

2 сент. 2022 г. · XFS for main array (media), BTRFS for cache drives and docker app data, ZFS via plugin, experimenting with 2nd data pool for “critical data”.

30 нояб. 2023 г. · Btrfs and xfs are both very stable and reliable. Btrfs wins in more difficult environments such as a home users computer that could be accidentally powered off ...