27 февр. 2011 г. · It is usually a bad idea: those three operators have a sequencing effect which is lost when you overload them.

25 февр. 2014 г. · Overloading logical NOT operator (!) seems to miss half of the truth evaluation semantics while bool type-cast operator appears to cover them nicely.

18 сент. 2014 г. · The short circuiting behaviour of the operators && and || is an amazing tool for programmers. But why do they lose this behaviour when overloaded?

12 дек. 2010 г. · Always stick to the operator's well-known semantics. C++ poses no limitations on the semantics of overloaded operators. Your compiler will ...

8 окт. 2021 г. · I would like to understand better about overloading && and || operators and the loss of its short-circuit behaviour.

19 дек. 2016 г. · C++17 defines an explicit order of evaluation of left-to-right for && and ||, whether they are overloaded or not. Short circuit evaluation still only applies ...

11 сент. 2023 г. · I want to have the operator on the right side of the typename not on the left side (i! not !i). Is this possible? No, it isn't.

16 апр. 2013 г. · You should not overload bool operator&&, since you lose short circuit evaluation, as you have discovered. The correct approach would be to give your class a ...

28 апр. 2012 г. · All I want to do is compare the contents of both the strings. How could I possibly do that without having to overload the [] operators as well?

29 апр. 2011 г. · I want objects of the class to evaluate to true on success and false on error. Which operator do I override to control the truthiness of my ...