The court held that Mr. Stevenson, the manufacturer of the ginger beer, owed a duty of care to Mrs. Donoghue, a consumer of his product, even though she had not ... Hedley Byrne v Heller · Caparo Industries v Dickman · Tort Law - Negligence

Donoghue v Stevenson is the landmark case in tort law. The wider importance of the case is that it established the general principle of the duty of care concept ...

Donoghue v Stevenson ; Manufacturers have a legal duty of care to the ultimate consumers of their products if it is not possible for defects to be identified ...

The House of Lords held that the manufacturer owed a duty of care to her, which was breached, because it was reasonably foreseeable that failure to ensure the ...

7 апр. 2023 г. · Holding; The House of Lords ultimately found in favour of Mrs Donoghue, holding that Mr Stevenson did owe a duty of care to her.

On 9th April 1929 Mrs Mary M'Alister or Donoghue brought an action against David Stevenson aerated water manufacturer Paisley, in which she claimed £500 as ...

23 сент. 2022 г. · This case established the 'neighbour principle' to establish a duty of care, a defendant owes a duty of care to their neighbours, ...

4 сент. 2024 г. · This is a landmark judgment by the House of Lords which laid down the general principles of the duty of care in cases of negligence.

The concept of 'reasonability' of the duty of care has been laid down by the House of Lords in 1932 in the case of Donoghue v. Stevenson.

1 окт. 2024 г. · The House of Lords held that Stevenson owed a duty of care to Mrs Donoghue. The court found that it was reasonably foreseeable that a decomposed ...