The court held that the misstatement of the reasoning behind issuing the debentures was a material misstatement of fact and that the plaintiff had been ...

Edgington v Fitzmaurice (1885) 29 Ch D 459 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation. It holds that a statement of present intentions ...

Citations: (1885) 29 Ch D 459. Facts. The defendants were the directors of a company. They issued a prospectus inviting investors to subscribe for debentures in ...

Key points · A statement of intention is a statement of fact and can thus be the basis for an actionable misrepresentation · A misstatement need not be the sole ...

Edgington v Fitzmaurice (1885) 29 Ch D 459. The claimant purchased some shares in the defendant company. The company prospectus stated the shares were being ...

6 июл. 2024 г. · 29 Ch D 459 involved a misrepresentation in a prospectus sent by company directors to shareholders, inviting subscriptions for debenture bonds.

Brief Fact Summary. Defendants sought funding for a property and Plaintiff advanced Defendants 1500 pounds. Defendants made several misstatements to ...

5 июл. 2023 г. · In the case of Edgington v Fitzmaurice [1885] 29 Ch D 459, the courts came to a ruling on the issue of debentures and whether three professed ...

This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Edgington v Fitzmaurice (1885) 29 Ch D 459. The document also includes supporting commentary from ...

Edgington v Fitzmaurice. 07 Mar 1885 29 ChD 459, CA. Case Info. Download PDF ... v. FITZMAURICE. [1882 E. 920.] 1884 May 7, 8, 9, 12. 1885 Feb. 27, 28 ...