21 июл. 2020 г. · The NKJV is a fine translation, and I mean that positively. It's the closest thing to a majority text translation (rather than the eclectic ...

31 мар. 2023 г. · Yes. It's readable, fairly literal, and is very close to the old King James. You also have great footnotes on differences in the New Testament ...

21 окт. 2018 г. · In short, there is no good reason to use the NKJV. Use one of the many other good modern translations. Or, if the lofty language is ...

6 нояб. 2022 г. · It's not great, but not horrible. The biggest issue is the use of the Textus Receptus. I'd recommend NRSV.

20 дек. 2016 г. · The NKJV is easier to read and understand than the KJV. However, my biggest problem is that it uses the Textus Receptus rather than making use ...

7 мая 2022 г. · The NKJV. Based off of better manuscripts and is incredibly understandable.

20 мая 2023 г. · ESV is great, but I like the NKJV better for its use of nearly every available manuscript.

17 сент. 2023 г. · I generally read NKJV or NASB and find them to be good translations. Upvote

29 мая 2022 г. · If English is your first language, I'd suggest NKJV. Probably easier to comprehend.

14 июл. 2021 г. · It is the best translation for English-speakers: translated from the best source texts, using the best premise, and for the best reasons.