1 мая 2010 г. · I think in general, instanceof is most useful when dealing with APIs or libraries that you don't control. Is it good practice to often use instanceof? - java - Stack Overflow Why not use instanceof operator in OOP design? - Stack Overflow Другие результаты с сайта stackoverflow.com

8 июн. 2018 г. · Using instanceOf to compare classes may have violated OOP rules, but it does not win over readability and maintainability in this case. Reply.

30 авг. 2015 г. · It's usually bad practice because: Using instanceof means you are treating different subclasses of a superclass in different ways. Why is the Java instanceof keyword a code smell? What is the purpose of the instanceof operator in Java? Другие результаты с сайта www.quora.com

14 сент. 2019 г. · instanceof should be your last resort · You are using bad abstraction. It hides away more then it should have. · You are trying to unify things ...

Many hold that the instanceof operator should be used only as a last resort, and that an overridden method is usually (but not always) a better alternative.

13 окт. 2014 г. · Instanceof in and of itself isn't necessarily bad. The problem is, most cases where a programmer would think to use instanceof are symptoms of ... Is Pattern Matching not a code smell? : r/javahelp - Reddit type .kind checks vs. class instanceof checks : r/typescript - Reddit [Java] How to get around using instanceof? - Reddit Am I the only one who does not like the instanceof pattern ... Другие результаты с сайта www.reddit.com

2 авг. 2021 г. · But the tricky aspect of an instanceof is that if you ever add another ParentEntity subclass, the instanceof check might no longer be correct.

28 окт. 2016 г. · Using instanceof is a code smell. I think we may agree on that. Whenever I see a construction like that, I'm sure that something went awry.

20 июн. 2006 г. · Hi all. I just decided to write a message regarding the myth that the use of the instanceof keyword is categorically bad. Not all java

5 июн. 2013 г. · Yes, it's a bad practice, because you're adding functionality to the Timeable interface that you're not specifically declaring, namely the possibility of also ...