Judicial restraint is a judicial interpretation that recommends favoring the status quo in judicial activities and is the opposite of judicial activism.

The term "judicial self-restraint" could be used in at least five different senses: (1) A self-restrained, judge does not allow his own views of policy to.

18 окт. 2024 г. · Judicial restraint is the refusal to exercise judicial review in deference to the process of ordinary politics. What is the significance of ...

implied,46 the post-Civil War Court's emphasis on self-restraint was a judicial concomitant of the resurgence of states'-rights. Thus self-restraint may, as in.

Judicial self-restraint, once a rallying cry for judges and law professors, has fallen on evil days. It is rarely invoked or advocated.

Once a case has come before the Court on its merits, the justices are forced to give some explanation for whatever action they may take. Here self-restraint can ...

Judicial self-restraint is the guarantor of the liberty to make laws that an unrestrained originalism puts at risk.

Posner, Richard A. (1983) "The Meaning of Judicial Self-Restraint," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 59: Iss. 1, Article 1.

stroyed. The meaning of judicial self restraint is that the judge will suc cessfully restrain himself from put ting his own convictions ahead ot the law. If ...

This work is concerned more narrowly with that aspect of judicial self-restraint most germane to Baker v. Carr, the doctrine of "political questions." II. The ...