Tahsildar Singh And Another vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 5 May, 1959 · State (Delhi Administration) vs Pali Ram on 26 September, 1978 · State Of U. · Sky Land ... |
25 дек. 2022 г. · 10 Landmark Cases on Evidence Law · 1. OOP KUMAR V. MOHAN THEDANI, AIR 2003 SC 2418 · 2. BODHA AND ORS V. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR, 2022 SC · 3. |
M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra (1961): This case is a landmark judgment on the admissibility of circumstantial evidence in Indian courts. The court held ... |
15 мая 2024 г. · The article titled 'Landmark Cases on the Law of Evidence' summarizes the rulings issued by Indian courts in the realm of evidence law. |
(Indian) Evidence Act (1982), Section 101/Definition of 'burden of proof' in a case where a person after attaining majority, questions sale of his property ... |
We finely curated all Landmark Judgements like Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Civil Law, and more ... Indian Evidence Act · Indian Contract Act · Hindu Law ... |
Subject-wise Landmark Judgments ; 1, Evidence Of Interested Person Can Be Considered If It Is Corroborated: Supreme Court./इच्छुक व्यक्ति के साक्ष्य की पुष्टि होने पर उस पर विचार ... |
The Supreme Court held that the High Court was wrong in holding that education provided under the Madarsa Act is violative of Article 21A. |
We shall, therefore, confine ourselves to important judgments of the Privy Council and the Supreme Court, and very important rulings of the High Courts. 8.53. A ... |
11 окт. 2021 г. · This article provides a list of precedent judgments that serve as a source of interpretation of the Act of 1872 by the Indian courts Introduction · Landmark judgments... |
Novbeti > |
Axtarisha Qayit Anarim.Az Anarim.Az Sayt Rehberliyi ile Elaqe Saytdan Istifade Qaydalari Anarim.Az 2004-2023 |