Limiting study inclusion on the basis of language of publication is a common practice in systematic reviews. Neimann Rasmussen and Montgomery cite lack of ...

27 дек. 2020 г. · Language restrictions in systematic reviews (SRs) should be avoided because they may lead to language bias, a systematic bias due to the ...

Language restrictions in systematic reviews (SRs) should be avoided because they may lead to language bias, a systematic bias due to the selection of reports ...

Reading and using only English language research could provide a biased assessment of a topic, and can lead to biased results in systematic reviews.

A recent review of 300 systematic reviews finding approximately 16% of reviews limited to trials published in English.

22 окт. 2024 г. · A potential risk of bias is detected here, as limiting studies to a single language may exclude relevant research or leave out cultural ...

Language bias in systematic reviews: you only get out what you put in. JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Sep;18(9):1818-1819. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00361.

Limiting study inclusion on the basis of language of publication is a common practice in systematic reviews. Neimann Rasmussen and Montgomery cite lack of ...

26 сент. 2024 г. · There is conflicting evidence on whether language restrictions increase the risk of language bias within SLRs (8). Egger et al, 1997 found ...

Conclusion · Evidence summary. In general, 26% of orthodontic SRs included non-English language studies in this assessment, which may lead to language bias.