25 окт. 2023 г. · I've used FastAPI and Litestar. Both are great. I think the learning curve on Litestar is a little bit steeper for people new to API frameworks, ... |
28 февр. 2023 г. · FastAPI lacks class-based controllers, which are the basis of robust software development. Thus, Starlite is preferred for robust development. |
14 апр. 2024 г. · At least according to the devs behind Litestar, they believe it is more feature complete than Fastapi. I'd agree. |
7 авг. 2023 г. · My vote goes to Litestar. I've used FastAPI for several years but my team has recently moved to Litestar for any new services. Their community ... |
2 нояб. 2023 г. · Litestar looks fine for new projects. But it's NOT syntax compatible with FastAPI. See the migration guide here: https://docs.litestar.dev/ ... |
15 июн. 2024 г. · FastAPI already does anything Litestar does & more, and actual companies use FastAPI (1,600,000 downloads/day). Nobody except a couple people in ... |
23 апр. 2024 г. · If you're familiar with FastAPI and other python API frameworks, Litestar is a great alternative. [I am not the author] It integrates easily ... |
1 окт. 2023 г. · FastAPI has its strengths, but alternatives like Flask, Django, Sanic, Quart, Emmet, Litestar, or any of the 98 viable web frameworks we have ... |
28 июл. 2024 г. · I migrated to Litestar because the sole maintainer of FastAPI is involved in several hi-key projects and non of them is receiving enough ... |
22 июл. 2022 г. · Blacksheep seems to be fastest among the 3 as far as I have seen but FastAPI is most popular and claims to be fastest when you consider its features of ... |
Novbeti > |
Axtarisha Qayit Anarim.Az Anarim.Az Sayt Rehberliyi ile Elaqe Saytdan Istifade Qaydalari Anarim.Az 2004-2023 |