13 апр. 2024 г. · You're supposed to fix MTU configuration of the WireGuard interface on both sides or all sides. Instead of using a hack like TCP MSS clamping.

13 дек. 2023 г. · It's because IPv6 has 40 bytes of headers, so that combined with the 40 bytes of Wireguard headers means you'd need a MTU of 1420 if you use and ...

8 июн. 2024 г. · Setting the MTU lower than necessary will slowdown the data throughput speed of your connection. For every X amount of MTU data (payload) an ...

2 мар. 2024 г. · ... wireguard forwarded packets to MTU-40, so 1380 in case of MTU 1420. /ip firewall mangle add chain=forward out-interface=wireguard protocol ...

25 мая 2023 г. · To the OP: Try to set your MTU to 1500 bytes in both sides, it should solve your problem. If not, try decreasing MTU by 10 bytes until it works ...

31 авг. 2024 г. · I use WireGuard with BGP/OSPF to manage nearly 200 sites seamlessly. Additionally, I implement a mesh topology to ensure uninterrupted routing.

19 сент. 2024 г. · If your using WireGuard over IPv4, then your MTU needs to be atleast 60 bytes lower than then MTU of the network your connecting over. so ...

27 янв. 2024 г. · I noticed that the EoIP interface reports an actual MTU of 1378. I noticed on the bridge, it has a few different MTUs reported: Actual MTU ( ...

27 дек. 2023 г. · I'd suggest MTU=1492 for the PPPoE connection, MTU=1280 for Wireguard, and if you have an MSS clamping value to set, let MSS=1360.

8 февр. 2022 г. · I have a 1Gbit/s connection from my server to my clients but can't use it even close when using Wireguard. The maximum I'm getting is 200Mbit/s.