A case in which the Court found that "obscene materials" do not have First Amendment protection.

This case involves the application of a State's criminal obscenity statute to a situation in which sexually explicit materials have been thrust by aggressive ...

Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court clarifying the legal definition of obscenity as material that ...

Appellant was convicted of mailing unsolicited sexually explicit material in violation of a California statute that approximately incorporated the obscenity ...

1 янв. 2009 г. · In Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), the Supreme Court upheld the prosecution of a California publisher for the distribution of obscene ...

Appellant was convicted of mailing unsolicited sexually explicit material in violation of a California statute that approximately incorporated the obscenity ...

In this case, the Appellant, Miller (Appellant), conducted a mass mailing campaign to advertise the sale of illustrated adult material books. The Appellant's ...

This case involves the application of a state's criminal obscenity statute to a situation in which sexually explicit materials have been thrust by aggressive ...

About this Item · Title. U.S. Reports: Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973). · Names. Burger, Warren Earl (Judge) · Created / Published. 1972 · Headings. - ...

MILLER V. CALIFORNIA OFFERED THE FOLLOWING TEST OF OBSCENITY AS A BASIC GUIDELINE FOR TRIERS OF FACT: (A) WHETHER THE AVERAGE PERSON, APPLYING CONTEMPORARY ...