Miller was arrested, charged, and convicted under a California law that banned selling, possessing, distributing, or publishing obscene materials. The law had ...

In a 5-to-4 decision, the Court held that obscene materials did not enjoy First Amendment protection. The Court modified the test for obscenity established in ...

The Appellant's conviction was specifically based on his conduct in causing five unsolicited advertising brochures to be sent through the mail.

Miller v. California, 413 US 15 (1973), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court clarifying the legal definition of obscenity.

No. 70-73. Argued January 18-19, 1972-Reargued November 7,. 1972-Decided June 21,-1973. Appellant was convicted of mailing unsolicited sexually explicit ...

In Miller v. California, a California publisher, Malcolm Miller, challenged his misdemeanor conviction for allegedly sending unsolicited obscene materials ... Define Obscenity · Miller v. California 1973: Case...

A California jury convicted Miller of violating a California criminal statute that prohibited the distribution of obscene materials. The trial court had ...

1 янв. 2009 г. · In Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), the Supreme Court upheld the prosecution of a California publisher for the distribution of obscene ...

Appellant was convicted of mailing unsolicited sexually explicit material in violation of a California statute that approximately incorporated the obscenity ...

In Miller v. California (1973), it devised a three-part test to determine whether a work was obscene: (1) “the average person, applying contemporary community ...