A case in which the Court found that "obscene materials" do not have First Amendment protection.

Miller v. California, 413 US 15 (1973), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court clarifying the legal definition of obscenity.

1 янв. 2009 г. · The Supreme Court in Miller v. California established a new standard for determining what could be considered obscene materials and subject to government ...

This case involves the application of a state's criminal obscenity statute to a situation in which sexually explicit materials have been thrust by aggressive ...

In Miller v. California (1973), it devised a three-part test to determine whether a work was obscene: (1) “the average person, applying contemporary community ...

Appellant was convicted of mailing unsolicited sexually explicit material in violation of a California statute that approximately incorporated the obscenity ...

The Appellant's conviction was specifically based on his conduct in causing five unsolicited advertising brochures to be sent through the mail.

In Miller v. California, a California publisher, Malcolm Miller, challenged his misdemeanor conviction for allegedly sending unsolicited obscene materials ...

MILLER V. CALIFORNIA OFFERED THE FOLLOWING TEST OF OBSCENITY AS A BASIC GUIDELINE FOR TRIERS OF FACT: (A) WHETHER THE AVERAGE PERSON, APPLYING CONTEMPORARY ...