Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that law enforcement in the United States must ... |
A case in which the Court held that law enforcement cannot use testimony given by anyone under interrogation while in custody without that person being ... |
| Миранда против Аризоны Случай |  |
Миранда против Аризоны 384 U.S. 436 — историческое дело, рассмотренное Верховным Судом Соединённых Штатов Америки. Рассматривалось с 28 февраля по 1 марта 1966 года, решение оглашено 13 июня 1966 года. Википедия
Источник : 384 U.S. 436 (ещё)
At trial, the oral and written confessions were presented to the jury. Miranda was found guilty of kidnapping and rape and was sentenced to 20-30 years ... |
In a 5-4 Supreme Court decision Miranda v. Arizona (1966) ruled that an arrested individual is entitled to rights against self-incrimination and to an attorney. |
Miranda was found guilty of kidnapping and rape. He was sentenced to 20 to 30 years' imprisonment on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. On appeal, ... |
8 июн. 2023 г. · It involved a young Mexican-American man named Ernesto Arturo Miranda who had been arrested in 1963 based on circumstantial evidence he had ... |
Miranda confessed to the crime and was ultimately convicted. The Warren Court threw out Miranda's conviction. Miranda was part of the Warren Court's revolution ... |
Ernesto Miranda, a Mexican immigrant living in Phoenix, Arizona, was identified in a police lineup by a woman, who accused him of kidnapping and raping her. |
The case began with the 1963 arrest of Phoenix resident Ernesto Miranda, who was charged with rape, kidnapping, and robbery. Miranda was not informed of his ... |
Запросы по теме
| Novbeti > |
| Axtarisha Qayit Anarim.Az Anarim.Az Sayt Rehberliyi ile Elaqe Saytdan Istifade Qaydalari Anarim.Az 2004-2023 |