A case in which the Court held that law enforcement cannot use testimony given by anyone under interrogation while in custody without that person being ...

The defendants offered incriminating evidence during police interrogations without prior notification of their rights under the Fifth Amendment of the United ...

At trial, the oral and written confessions were presented to the jury. Miranda was found guilty of kidnapping and rape and was sentenced to 20-30 years ...

In a 5-4 Supreme Court decision Miranda v. Arizona (1966) ruled that an arrested individual is entitled to rights against self-incrimination and to an attorney.

The State of Arizona charged Miranda with kidnapping and rape. At trial, the court admitted his confession, and a jury convicted him. The Arizona Supreme Court ...

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of a man convicted on the basis of a confession that was elicited during the course of Arizona police interrogations.

Miranda was found guilty of kidnapping and rape. He was sentenced to 20 to 30 years' imprisonment on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. On appeal, ...

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that law enforcement in the United States must ...

[This case involves] basic rights that are enshrined in our Constitution—that “No person…shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against ...

During the interrogation, Miranda confessed to kidnapping and raping an 18-year-old woman. His confession, obtained without any advisement of rights or access ...