28 мая 2023 г. · In this post, we'll explore four specific argument forms based on conditional statements. Two of these argument forms are valid: modus ponens and modus tollens.

Affirming the antecedent (modus ponens) and denying the consequent (modus tollens) are valid. Affirming the consequent and denying the antecedent are invalid.

“Affirming the Consequent” is the name of an invalid conditional argument form. You can think of it as the invalid version of modus ponens.

9 мая 2018 г. · Modus ponens is a valid argument form in Western philosophy because the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion; however, ...

Both have apparently similar but invalid forms: affirming the consequent and denying the antecedent. Constructive dilemma is the disjunctive version of modus ...

5 июл. 2024 г. · Affirming the consequent is the logical fallacy of assuming a particular cause must be true just because its expected outcome is true.

There are two consistent logical argument constructions: modus ponens ("the way that affirms by affirming") and modus tollens ("the way that denies by denying") ...

Mental models theories predict that people draw MP and invalid affirming-the-consequent (AC) inferences. Three experiments tested these predictions.

14 янв. 2023 г. · Affirming the consequent (or fallacious modus ponens) is a logical fallacy confusing the directionality of if-then propositions.