22 мар. 2016 г. · The academic who maintains that page selected a random Bible passage to analyze and found numerous problems with the NET's translation.

4 мая 2023 г. · The translation notes are super helpful. But there is a lack of consistency between books of the bible. It seems like they assigned different ...

16 янв. 2022 г. · Are there places in the NET bible that do reflect the Dispensationalist bias of its translators? (edit for typing goofs).

20 сент. 2020 г. · What do Bible scholars think? Is the NET Bible (along with its footnotes) considered balanced and accurate? Are any of its materials considered ...

15 февр. 2024 г. · I use it and have never had any problems with it. I used power lookup to have the notes separately for a while but have reverted to just ...

9 мая 2020 г. · NET Bible is not a great translation (Translation is uneven depending on who was the general editor for which books) but the footnotes are ...

27 янв. 2023 г. · TL/DR NETS is good, but very hard to read due to transliterating names rather than anglifying them like most other translations do. The author ...

9 апр. 2014 г. · The value of the NET is in the notes...they reveal a lot of the issues behind the English text, discussing specific choices and textual problems ...

27 мая 2016 г. · Okay so bad translations include the JST, The NWT and the Recovery version. these are put out by people trying to alter the meaning of scripture ...

24 мая 2022 г. · The most commonly cited "scholarly" English translation is the NRSV, but it's still so very unscholarly.