24 авг. 2021 г. · This new 2011 edition of the NIV is actually a minor revision of the TNIV, the gender-neutralizing revision of the NIV that was published in 2005.

15 мар. 2022 г. · The 1984 NIV is a solid translation that is very readable. NASB95 is the most precise/literal translation, but it is HARD to read. It's good for ...

24 авг. 2024 г. · I don't like either, but I've seen some of the major mistakes corrected in the 2011 version. I haven't read it much, though...mainly the 1984 one.

21 апр. 2020 г. · From my understanding, the main difference between the 1984 NIV and the 2011 NIV is the switch to gender inclusive language. This is a positive, ...

5 дек. 2022 г. · Both the 84 and 11 are readable and generally good translation albeit with a few flaws. What those flaws are will depend in who you ask.

4 июл. 2022 г. · The NIV did have a significant revision in 2011. However, the issue you have noted is still present. Both 9:7 and 22:9 are legitimately possible ...

22 янв. 2024 г. · The NIV is fine. Due to the gender neutral language used in the 2011 translation it is no longer the gold standard for evangelicals. https:// ...

12 апр. 2023 г. · It was discontinued in 2011 along with the 1995 tNIV. Ebay would be your primary source, but used bookstores would be another possibility. I've ...

26 янв. 2018 г. · It looks like all of these comments pertain to the original 1984 NIV. The 2011 revision is a significant improvement – though it's certainly ...

10 апр. 2019 г. · I believe the original NIV was released in 1984. The latest major update being from 2011. Edit: the first revision was 1984. The first full ...