17 апр. 2023 г. · The GRFP program has a problem in that most reviewers think a good chunk (>25%) of their grants should be funded, but the actually funding rate is less than 10 ...

15 апр. 2024 г. · Reviewer 3 said my undergraduate GPA was not up to par but I was more than competitive with top applicants in terms of research and outreach ...

5 дек. 2022 г. · Reviewing for NSF grants was one of the worst professional experiences I've had. Preening panelists who hadn't read the applications, younger ...

23 мар. 2021 г. · The first two reviewers gave me "Excellent" in all categories and glowing reviews plus "Weaknesses: None." And then there was Reviewer 3.

1 апр. 2020 г. · A GRFP reviewer (in Chemical Engineering) regarding the application review process that might either help folks interpret/rationalize their results or improve ...

21 апр. 2020 г. · They were all super positive about me, my skills, my intelligence/potential, my past and future outreach, my writing, and found the questions ...

4 апр. 2024 г. · NSF talks a lot about equitability in their broader impacts statements, but the GRFP is an extremely inequitable system. The panels are made up ...

23 мар. 2021 г. · Last year I applied and had excellent from two and poor from one. The two excellent reviews mentioned specific plans I had in my document. The ...

21 мар. 2024 г. · ... Reviews are now available for all GRFP 2024 applications through the GRFP module on Research.gov! Email notifications have been sent to all GRFP ...

23 апр. 2020 г. · I'm sure the reviewers had issues with my application somehow, as I'm only a second year grad student and I wasn't super confident in it anyway.