O'Bannon v. NCAA, 802 F.3d 1049 (9th Cir. 2015), was an antitrust class action lawsuit filed against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA).

The district court held that the NCAA's amateurism rules were an unlawful restraint of trade in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

In O'Bannon v. NCAA, the Court decided to allow members of the NCAA to give scholarships for the full cost of attendance to student-athletes.

In this article, Professor John Wolohan gives a complete analysis of the recent O'Bannon v. NCAA judgment, and reflects on how it affects the parties moving ...

29 мая 2024 г. · O'Bannon then led a lawsuit against the NCAA and EA, arguing violations of federal antitrust law and California's right of publicity law. He ...

30 сент. 2015 г. · O'Bannon alleged that the NCAA's amateurism rules preventing student-athletes from being compensated for the use of their names, images and ...

30 сент. 2015 г. · The district court held that the NCAA's amateurism rules were an unlawful restraint of trade in violation of Section 1.

The trial court found the NCAA compensation rules to be an unlawful restraint of trade and enjoined it from prohibiting schools from paying athletes up to ...

24 мар. 2017 г. · O'Bannon identified two markets in which the NCAA caused anticompetitive effects: (1) the “college education market,” where schools compete to ...

... O'Bannon v. NCAA, the first federal appellate court decision holding that an NCAA student-athlete eligibility rule violates section 1 of the Sherman Act ...