Peek (plaintiff) purchased large numbers of shares in Overend and Gurney on the stock exchange in October and December. After the company's dissolution, Peek ... |
This case concerns itself with the act of misrepresentation made in the prospectus. The concept of misrepresentation and fraud is given under Section 18 and 17 ... |
26 янв. 2023 г. · Case study Peek v Gurney (1873) LR 6 HL 377 [3.121] A prospectus issued to the public by the promoters of a company contained a number of ... |
5 дек. 2021 г. · He sought an indemnity against the directors, alleging misrepresentation and concealment of facts by the directors in the prospectus. Held: The ... |
Оценка 5,0 (13) 6 апр. 2017 г. · Held: There was a false representation here that the gun was safe, and that is fraud. The defendant knew that the gun was to be used by the ... |
14 июн. 2019 г. · Horsfall v Thomas (1862). The person mislead must be aware of the statement. It must address the party mislead. Peek v Gurney (1873). Person ... |
1 сент. 2024 г. · In this torts case, the court found that to maintain an action for deceit, there must be an active misrepresentation by the defendant. Не найдено: (1873 | Нужно включить: (1873 |
1 сент. 2018 г. · It was held that the company owed a duty of care to the plaintiff and he could receive damages for the negligent misrepresentation. |
Peek later bought his shares on the open market and lost a lot of money. He made a claim against Gurney based on the false prospectus but it was not a ... |
Novbeti > |
Axtarisha Qayit Anarim.Az Anarim.Az Sayt Rehberliyi ile Elaqe Saytdan Istifade Qaydalari Anarim.Az 2004-2023 |