The defendant was convicted of breaking into the victim's flat and raping her twice. There was no dispute that sexual intercourse had taken place on two ...

The defendant initiated sex with the complainant. When sex began, either the woman consented or the defendant believed that she consented.

Оценка 4,4 (13) R v Kaitamaki AC 147 (PC) Facts D broke into flat twice, and raped her twice. There was no dispute that sexual intercourse had taken place on both occasions ...

Kaitamaki v R [1985] AC 147. The defendant was charged with rape. His defence was that when he penetrated the woman he thought she was consenting. When he ...

R v Kaitamaki (1985) – D had sex with V and believed she was consenting – upon realizing that she objected he did not withdraw – held that this was rape ...

21 мая 2021 г. · See New Zealand Privy Council case of Kaitamaki v The Queen [1985] AC 147. Consent to serious harm for sexual gratification. A person is ...

Kaitamaki v The Queen [1984] Privy Council (New Zealand). Facts: The defendant (D) broke into a young woman's flat and twice raped her. D claimed that the woman ...

Продолжительность: 2:04
Опубликовано: 5 февр. 2021 г.

Explain R V KAITAMAKI (Continuation). If after he has… Study These Flashcards. A. If, after he has penetrated a woman, a man realises that she is not ...

Kaitamaki v r. penetration in common law ; r v olugboja. ordinary meaning of consent to be left to common sense of the jury ; r on the app of f v dpp. broad ...