A jury convicted the defendant of wounding with intent to resist arrest under s.18 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861.

However, Morrison's defense argued that while he intended to resist arrest, he did not intend to cause the officer serious harm. The court accepted this ...

This is a case in which the applicant Lowell Morrison was convicted in the St. Catherine circuit court for rape.

Morrison 1989 arrest him but defendant leapt though window, dragging officer, who was badly cut by glass. GBH s18 Defendant was convicted as either intended ...

A step that solicits information that does not in fact reasonably support a belief that the other party is of legal age cannot constitute a reasonable step.

Morrison (1989) A police officer seized the D and told him she was arresting him. D dived through a window dragging the police officer with him.

As suggested by R v Morrison (1989) 89 Cr App R 17s 18 MR: Intent is Key. s 18 requires intent (not mere recklessness) in two ways. 'with intent to do some ...

The defendants were convicted of theft under s.1 of the Theft Act 1968 after switching the labels on products in a supermarket to obtain a lower price.

Fundamentals of Financial Management, Concise Edition ; 1. AR OF GBH S18 ; 2. Triable either way offences ; 3. R v Morrison (1989) ; 4. R v Taylor (2009).

Gage J found that Morrison was “at least indifferent to the age of the person he was communicating with. Indifference, however, is not the equivalent of belief ...