Key point. Evidence of sexual infidelity is admissible since can form the context for the qualifying trigger for loss of control ...

In the first case, Clinton killed his wife in their family home because of her sexual infidelity. He was convicted of murder and arson by the Crown Court.

R v Clinton [2012] EWCA Crim 2 is a judgment of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales concerning the loss of control defence to murder, and the context ...

10 июл. 2024 г. · The appellant argued that he lost control due to several factors, including his wife's revelation of infidelity and other provocative actions.

17 янв. 2012 г. · The ancient common law defence of provocation, reducing murder to manslaughter, was abolished and consigned to legal history books. 2. It was ...

R v Clinton [2012] EWCA Crim 2 (Court of Appeal). The appellant and his wife both suffered from depression for which they were on prescribed medication.

This case document summarizes the facts and decision in R v Clinton [2012] EWCA Crim 2, Court of Appeal. The document also included supporting commentary from ...

The appellant was convicted at the Crown Court in Reading for the murder of his wife. His evidence was that prior to the fatal attack his wife explained that ...

30 окт. 2016 г. · The Court of Appeal held that where sexual infidelity is integral to and forms an essential part of the context in which to make a just evaluation.

27 нояб. 2012 г. · This case commentary is concerned with the appeal of Jon Jacques Clinton, as it addressed the ambit of the Act‟s controversial exclusion of sexual infidelity.