120. Number of overlapping holdings ; 51.3%. % of SCHG's 231 holdings also in VUG ; 64.9%. % of VUG's 192 holdings also in SCHG ...

165. Number of overlapping holdings ; 43.8%. % of VONG's 399 holdings also in SCHG ; 70.5%. % of SCHG's 231 holdings also in VONG ...

SCHG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.04%, versus 0.04% for VUG. SCHG is up 25.03% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4.00B in YTD flows. VUG ...

Compare SCHG and VUG ETFs on current and historical performance, AUM, flows, holdings, costs, ESG ratings, and many other metrics.

Продолжительность: 13:05
Опубликовано: 11 сент. 2024 г.

2 мая 2024 г. · SCHG has better filter metrics than VUG (like forward p/e ratio, estimated 3-5 yrs earnings growth etc) which matter when the going gets tough ... VOO + SCHD + SCHG redundant? : r/dividends What's wrong with fund overlap? : r/ETFs Decided on SCHD & VUG forever : r/ETFs Question about overlap + potential portfolio : r/ETFs Другие результаты с сайта www.reddit.com

VUG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.04%, versus 0.04% for SCHG. VUG is up 23.29% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9.74B in YTD flows. SCHG ...

11 июл. 2023 г. · SCHG has beaten VUG over each of the time frames discussed above, making it the top choice between the two, but both look like great ETFs.

Over the past 10 years, VUG has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 16.36%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.89% annualized return.

21 янв. 2021 г. · I think SCHG and VUG are both "growth" funds that follow "growth" indexes. In terms of building a portfolio, you do have unnecessary overlap.