THE ORIGINS OF THE RULE The practice of equity applying an analogous statutory time bar was recognised by Lord Camden in Smith v Clay (1767) 3 Bro CC 646; 29 ER ...

Smith is a citizen of Kentucky, and Clay of Louisiana, and the action was brought to recover a debt incurred in the year 1808.

In 1958 Kilgore sold most of the acreage to plaintiff Smith's predecessor in title in a deed making reference to the subdivision plat as revised and recorded.

2 июл. 2015 г. · A Court of Equity has always refused its aid to stale demands, where a party has slept upon his right and acquiesced for a great length of time.

This case comes up from the Louisiana district, by' writ' of error, to reverse a judgment obtained there by Smith vs. Clay,. Smith, is a citizen of Kentucky; ...

In the quote from Lord Camden in Smith v. Clay (1767), the concept of "stale demands" and the role of a court of equity are discussed. Lord Camden emphasizes ...

Оценка 4,4 (14) Smith v Clay (1767) 3 Bro CC 639 at 640: To the contrary, UK courts have preferred to extend common law. Douglas v Hello! [2001] QB 967 CA extending ...

Smith v. Clay (1767) Ambler 645;. Hayward v. Bank (1877) 96 UT. S. 611. Though each court will ex- ercise its discretion in deciding what is reasonable ...

11 мар. 2024 г. · Case law: Smith Vs. Clay. 1767 3 Bro CC 639. Where an injured party has been slow to demand a remedy for a wrong he has long regarded with ...

21 сент. 2021 г. · Smith v Clay (1767) 3 Bro CC 639. Solle v Butcher [1950] 1 KB 671. Tempest v Lord Camoys (1882) 21 Ch D 571. Thynne v Glengall (1848) 2 HL Cas ...