A case in which the Court found that police using a "stop and frisk" procedure are within their constitutional bounds as officers of the law.

Terry v. Ohio: Under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, a police officer may stop a suspect on the street and frisk him or her without probable ...

Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the court ruled that it is constitutional for American police to "stop ... Background · Case background · Supreme Court decision

Terry v. Ohio represents a clash between Fourth Amendment protection from intrusive, harassing conduct by police when no crime has been committed.

16 авг. 2024 г. · In the landmark Terry v. Ohio case, the Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of police stop and frisk procedures.

In this case, the Court concluded that the Fourth Amendment did not prohibit police from stopping a person they have reasonable suspicion to believe had ...

Terry v. Ohio, U.S. Supreme Court decision, issued on June 10, 1968, which held that police encounters known as stop-and-frisks, in which members of the ...

Title. U.S. Reports: Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). Names. White, Byron Raymond (Judge); Supreme Court of the United States (Author). Created / Published.

20 февр. 2024 г. · In 1968, the US Supreme Court decided, in the case Terry v. Ohio, that police using a “stop and frisk” procedure are within constitutional ...

Terry v. Ohio Case Brief - Rule of Law: An officer may perform a search for weapons without a warrant, even without probable cause, when the officer ...