A case in which the Court found that police using a "stop and frisk" procedure are within their constitutional bounds as officers of the law.

In June 1968, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the conviction and set a precedent that allows police officers to interrogate and frisk suspicious ...

Terry v. Ohio Case Brief - Rule of Law: An officer may perform a search for weapons without a warrant, even without probable cause, when the officer ...

Terry v. Ohio: Under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, a police officer may stop a suspect on the street and frisk him or her without probable ...

16 авг. 2024 г. · In the landmark Terry v. Ohio case, the Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of police stop and frisk procedures.

In this case, the Court concluded that the Fourth Amendment did not prohibit police from stopping a person they have reasonable suspicion to believe had ...

Terry v. Ohio, 392 US 1 (1968), was a landmark US Supreme Court decision in which the court ruled that it is constitutional for American police to stop and ...

Katz was never charged with anything, but Terry and Chilton were arrested, indicted, tried and convicted of violating Ohio's Carrying A Concealed Weapon ...

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state of Ohio and the Cleveland police, who conducted a “stop-and-frisk” of a suspect named Terry.

Both men were charged with carrying a concealed weapon, and Terry was convicted.