The issue in this case is not the abstract propriety of the police conduct but the admissibility against petitioner of the evidence uncovered by the search and ...

The facts of this case are illustrative of a proper stop and an incident frisk. Officer McFadden had no prob- able cause to arrest Terry for anything, but he ...

Katz was never charged with anything, but Terry and Chilton were arrested, indicted, tried and convicted of violating Ohio's Carrying A Concealed. Weapon ...

In this case, the Court concluded that the Fourth Amendment did not prohibit police from stopping a person they have reasonable suspicion to believe had ...

For reasons that will become apparent, the Su- preme Court chose Terry as the case to announce its approach to forcible police encounters with citizens short of ...

The controversies spawned by the Supreme Court's decision in Terry v. Ohio1 are just about as expansive as the decision's implications for the devel-.

The Court found that Officer McFadden reasonably suspected that Terry and others were planning a robbery and patted them down only to check for weapons, ...

He observes that the Court's remarks about the exclusionary rule were based on the erroneous assumption that McFadden's only option was to seize the men. If, as ...

case: Terry v. Ohio.1 Now that I have given substantial thought to the possible consequences of Terry's obliteration, and have immersed myself in chaos ...

Brief for Respondent on Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio at 15–16, Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) (No. 67). See also Herman Schwartz, Stop and ...