After the court denied their motion to suppress, Chilton and Terry waived jury trial and pleaded not guilty. The court adjudged them guilty, and the Court of ...

The facts of this case are illustrative of a proper stop and an incident frisk. Officer McFadden had no prob- able cause to arrest Terry for anything, but he ...

Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868 (1968). FACTS: Cleveland Police Detective Martin McFadden had been a policeman for 39 years, a detective for 35 ...

In this case, the Court concluded that the Fourth Amendment did not prohibit police from stopping a person they have reasonable suspicion to believe had ...

A case in which the Court found that police using a "stop and frisk" procedure are within their constitutional bounds as officers of the law.

In June 1968, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the conviction and set a precedent that allows police officers to interrogate and frisk suspicious ...

This case originally arose in the Common Pleas Court of Cuyahoga County, based upon the indictment for carrying a concealed weapon.

Terry Frisk · U.S. Reports · United States · Unreasonable Search and Seizure. Major Case Topic. Criminal Law and Procedure. Date. 1967. Authoring Justice.

In this case, the Court concluded that the Fourth Amendment did not prohibit police from stopping a person they have reasonable suspicion to believe had ...

TERRY V. OHIO was a landmark decision in the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that under the Fourth Amendment of the United States ...