A case in which the Court found that police using a "stop and frisk" procedure are within their constitutional bounds as officers of the law.

In this case, the Court concluded that the Fourth Amendment did not prohibit police from stopping a person they have reasonable suspicion to believe had ...

The court adjudged them guilty, and the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Judicial District, Cuyahoga County, affirmed. State v. Terry, 5 Ohio App. 2d 122, 214 N ...

16 авг. 2024 г. · In the landmark Terry v. Ohio case, the Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of police stop and frisk procedures.

20 февр. 2024 г. · In 1968, the US Supreme Court decided, in the case Terry v. Ohio, that police using a “stop and frisk” procedure are within constitutional bounds as officers ...

Specifically, the decision held that a police officer does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution's prohibition on unreasonable searches and ...

Terry v. Ohio, US Supreme Court decision, issued on June 10, 1968, which held that police encounters known as stop-and-frisks, in which members of the public ...

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed, and the Ohio Supreme Court dismissed Terry's appeal. The U.S. Supreme Court found that the officer's actions were proper and ...

The Court noted that they previously held that "the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places." But, also, "what the Constitution forbids is not all searches ...