25 мая 2024 г. · Overall, I believe that the Terry v. Ohio case could be considered an unachievable compromise between excessive aggression displayed by police ...

Terry v. Ohio represents a clash between Fourth Amendment protection from intrusive, harassing conduct by police when no crime has been committed.

Ohio Summary. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state of Ohio and the Cleveland police, who conducted a “stop-and-frisk” of a suspect named Terry.

A case in which the Court found that police using a "stop and frisk" procedure are within their constitutional bounds as officers of the law.

Summary. Police officers stopped three men on the street whom they suspected were planning a burglary. The officers did not have a warrant for the search ...

Free Essay: Terry v. Ohio is an important case in law enforcement. What did the Court say in this case, and why is it important? The Supreme Court made it.

Terry v. Ohio: Under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, a police officer may stop a suspect on the street and frisk him or her without probable ...

Terry v. Ohio Case Brief - Rule of Law: An officer may perform a search for weapons without a warrant, even without probable cause, when the officer ...

20 февр. 2024 г. · In 1968, the US Supreme Court decided, in the case Terry v. Ohio, that police using a “stop and frisk” procedure are within constitutional bounds as officers ...

16 авг. 2024 г. · In the landmark Terry v. Ohio case, the Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of police stop and frisk procedures.