19 окт. 2020 г. · The federal believed no army was necessary in times of peace{T/F} The Federalists believed that a strong central government was important for the growth of the ...

The Federalists believed in maintaining a standing army even during times of peace, as they thought it was necessary for national defense and maintaining order.

Federalist No. 24 challenged those who wish to prohibit a standing army in peacetime, arguing that its formation is essential for the security of the nation ...

Federalist No. 25 was written as an argument against the use of armies led by the states. Hamilton argued that a national army would be more accountable than ...

11 июн. 2024 г. · ” □ The Federalists believed no army was necessary in times of peace. □ The Federalists believed that a strong central government was ...

10 сент. 2024 г. · The authorities essential to the common defense are these: to raise armies; to build and equip fleets; to prescribe rules for the government of ...

15 июл. 2024 г. · The word “federal” is the same as the word “national.” The Federalists believed no army was necessary in times of peace. The Federalists ...

29 сент. 2010 г. · 10, argued the necessity and constitutional right for fostering a standing army in the United States during peacetime. The Federalists and Anti- ...

... armies in times of peace.” Mason's position is that a federal bill of rights is both imperative and valuable. He was concerned that Congress may abuse the ...