20 авг. 2023 г. · TL/DR - A few times Roman generals took the troops out of Britain to go claim themselves Emperor, and the natives revolted. Eventually, it ... |
15 янв. 2018 г. · A group of barbarian tribes broke through the defensive lines in eastern Gaul around 406 AD, and the Romans lost control of that area of Gaul ... |
13 сент. 2023 г. · A lack of political stability meant poorer agricultural productivity and less trade, leaving secondary industry less sustainable both due to ... |
15 янв. 2024 г. · No single reason but in short, Economic problems, Barbarian attacks and infighting, just wasn't seen as worth while to maintain rule over a ... |
19 окт. 2015 г. · The short answer is that Rome "fell" in that part of the western Empire even before 476. The main continent actually experienced some continuity. |
6 мая 2023 г. · I have read that the Roman settlements depopulated during this period, either due to economic collapse or plague. I saw reference to hillforts ... |
4 авг. 2012 г. · It seems like the Romans simply left Briton as soon as there was trouble in Rome from 410AD with the barbarian invasions. |
4 июл. 2022 г. · The people of Britain went through significant change in the Roman era, from blue-skinned tribes to the pre-Anglo-Saxon culture. |
18 авг. 2020 г. · The Romans stayed because England and Wales were rich in resources. Also holding England alone was hard enough, as the Romans needed to keep 3 legions in ... |
25 сент. 2024 г. · The short answer is that the Roman Empire was a global economy and that Britain relied on massive import exports of goods and when that economy ... |
Novbeti > |
Axtarisha Qayit Anarim.Az Anarim.Az Sayt Rehberliyi ile Elaqe Saytdan Istifade Qaydalari Anarim.Az 2004-2023 |