In short, equatorial attachments are more stable than axial attachments because they ensure a greater distance between the atoms of the molecule , which means that there is less repulsion between the atoms.
7 мар. 2016 г.
24 сент. 2022 г. · Substituents prefer equatorial rather than axial positions in order to minimize the steric strain created of 1,3-diaxial interactions. The more ... |
24 сент. 2022 г. · Each carbon in a cyclohexane ring has one axial and one equatorial bond. Also, remember that axial bonds are perpendicular with the ring and appear to be going ... |
17 окт. 2024 г. · This explains why equatorial conformations are generally more stable than axial conformations, especially when the substituent is larger. |
14 окт. 2024 г. · Size of the Substituent: Larger substituents experience greater 1,3-diaxial interactions, making the equatorial conformation even more favorable ... |
For mono-substituted cyclohexane, the equatorial-conformer is more stable than the axial-conformer because of the 1,3-diaxal interaction. |
24 мар. 2015 г. · Axial or Equatorial: Which position is better? 20K views · 9 years ago #studying #PearsonPlus #ThisIsYouLearning ...more. Pearson+ Channels. |
17 июл. 2022 г. · Also, Equatorial methylcyclohexane has less energy than that of axial Methylcyclohexane, which offers extra stability to the former one. Both, ... |
28 нояб. 2023 г. · Equatorial locations are often more stable and bigger than axial positions, which might have unfavorable interactions due to steric hindrance. |
Запросы по теме
| Novbeti > |
| Axtarisha Qayit Anarim.Az Anarim.Az Sayt Rehberliyi ile Elaqe Saytdan Istifade Qaydalari Anarim.Az 2004-2023 |