7 сент. 2023 г. · Because that line was an interpolation—a later addition, not part of the original text. The older manuscripts omit the entire sentence.

25 мар. 2018 г. · The reason is textual criticism. Biblical scholars and translators evaluate various manuscripts (in this case, in their original Greek) in ...

14 сент. 2021 г. · It is not that Matthew 17:21 is “missing” but that it appears not to have been original to the gospel. It is not present in the oldest and best ...

13 июл. 2022 г. · It is thought that the words of Matthew 17:21 were not original because they were not included in the oldest manuscripts that have been found. ...

11 янв. 2024 г. · The simplest answer is that the Bible is continually compared against the oldest texts known, since we dont have the originals.

30 июл. 2022 г. · The reason that Matthew 17:21 is not in the NIV (New International Version) is because it is not contained in the Greek Text that the translators adopted for ...

22 авг. 2018 г. · Why is Matthew 17:21 missing out of my Bible (ESV Study)?. The oldest known manuscripts of Matthew do not have that verse. That does not mean ...

19 окт. 2017 г. · Generally speaking, it's because they found an earlier reliable manuscript that didn't have the verse in it. It usually is noted in the text ...

14 июл. 2022 г. · It is thought that the words of Matthew 17:21 were not original because they were not included in the oldest manuscripts that have been found.

17 нояб. 2021 г. · In newer translations of the Bible, verses are sometimes omitted or noted differently due to differences in textual manuscripts used and efforts ...