'It must be remembered that the Bible is primarily a book of religion, a guide to faith. It was not a book of history, poetry, economics, or science. It ...

Considering the Bible as a historical text is not a matter of opinion, but a matter of facts, truth, and historicity.

8 июл. 2024 г. · The Bible is not a reliable historical source because it does not meet the standard criteria of source reliability used by historians. Authorship of the Bible · Influences · Counter arguments

17 нояб. 2016 г. · A lot of the bible can been seen as historical but many parts have been sensationalized and are not entirely true. Can the Bible be cited as a historical document? - Quora Is the Bible considered a historic account by historians? If not ... What evidence is there that the Bible is a reliable historical ... What is the meaning of 'the Bible is not a history book'? - Quora Другие результаты с сайта www.quora.com

Historians hold that the Bible should not be treated differently from other historical (or literary) sources from the ancient world. Materials and methods · Hebrew Bible/Old Testament

5 янв. 2023 г. · Because it's full of "historical" facts that cannot be verified by any other source, even fairly major ones. Like there's no trace whatever of ... Is the Bible a historical book and if it is does that mean ... - Reddit How would you respond to theists claiming “the bible is ... - Reddit How historically accurate is the bible? : r/history - Reddit Is the Bible used for any (non religious) historical research? Другие результаты с сайта www.reddit.com

The Bible is very reliable as a historical document. It has a great many ancient manuscripts that are extremely well preserved.

1 мая 2021 г. · Although the Bible is usually presented as a single book, it is in fact a collection of 66 documents, or books, written over a period of 1600 years.

18 сент. 2023 г. · Unfortunately, historical books are usually required to be factual, therefore the bible does not qualify. Because it's a load of bollocks.